Lot-to-lot consistency of a hexavalent DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine and non-inferiority to separate DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV antigen-matching vaccines at 6-8, 10-12, and 14-16 weeks of age co-administered with oral rotavirus vaccine in healthy infants in India: A multi-center, randomized, controlled study.

Background: Combination vaccines reduce the number of pediatric injections but must be as safe, immunogenic, and effective as each of the individual vaccines given separately. Additionally, consistency in manufacturing lots is essential for WHO prequalification. This study aimed to establish the lot-to-lot consistency of a fully liquid, hexavalent diphtheria (D)-tetanus (T)-whole-cell pertussis (wP)-inactivated poliovirus (IPV)-hepatitis B (HB)-Haemophilus influenzae b (PRP-T) (DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T) vaccine and to demonstrate non-inferiority to licensed DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV vaccines. Methods: A Phase III, randomized, active-controlled, and open-label study was conducted at multiple centers across India. Healthy infants who had received a birth dose of oral poliovirus vaccine and hepatitis B vaccine received one of three lots of DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T or separate DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV vaccines at 6-8, 10-12, and 14-16 weeks of age. Oral rotavirus vaccine was co-administered at 6-8 weeks of age and 10-12/14-16 weeks of age. DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T lot-to-lot consistency and non-inferiority (pooled DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T) versus DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV post-third dose were assessed using seroprotection rates (anti-D, anti-T, anti-HBs, anti-PRP, anti-polio 1, 2, 3) and adjusted geometric mean concentrations (anti-PT, anti-FIM). Safety was assessed by parental reports. Results: Lot-to-lot consistency was demonstrated for DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T and non-inferiority versus DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV was confirmed with 95% CIs for seroprotection rate differences and adjusted geometric mean concentration ratios within pre-defined clinical margins. Pooled seroprotection rate was ≥ 99.7% for anti-D ≥ 0.01 IU/mL, anti-T ≥ 0.01 IU/mL, anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL, anti-PRP ≥ 0.15 µg/mL, and anti-polio 1, 2, and 3 ≥ 8 (1/dil) and vaccine response rate was 83.9% for anti-PT and 97.7% for anti-FIM. There were no safety concerns. Conclusions: Immunogenicity of three lots of the fully liquid DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine was consistent and non-inferior to licensed comparators following vaccination at 6-8, 10-12, and 14-16 weeks of age. There were no safety concerns and no evidence of any effect of co-administration with rotavirus vaccine.

Antibody persistence following administration of a hexavalent DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine versus separate DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV vaccines at 12-24 months of age and safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T in healthy infants in India.

Background: The combination of whole-cell pertussis (wP) antigens with established diphtheria (D), tetanus (T), hepatitis B (HB), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), and inactivated poliomyelitis (IPV) antigens provides a high-quality DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine. This study evaluated a DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T booster coadministered with measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. Methods: Phase II, open-label, randomized study. Healthy toddlers who had previously completed a DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T or separate DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV primary vaccination series received a DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T booster vaccine at 12-24 months of age. All participants had also received 1 or 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine between primary vaccination and enrolment (N = 100 and N = 6, respectively). Those who had received 1 prior measles-containing vaccine received an MMR dose either concomitantly (N = 50) or 28 days after (N = 50) the DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T booster. Immunogenicity was evaluated using validated assays and safety by parental reports. Results: Pre-booster vaccination, 100.0% participants showed antibody persistence after DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T or DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV for anti-T (≥0.01 IU/mL), anti-Hib (≥0.15 µg/mL), and anti-polio 3 (≥8 1/dil) and at least 95.8% of participants for anti-D (≥0.01 IU/mL), anti-HB (≥10 mIU/mL), and anti-polio 1 and 2 (≥8 1/dil). For the pertussis antigens, pre-booster antibody persistence (≥2 EU/mL) ranged from 88.6 to 88.7% (anti-PT), 91.4-98.6% (anti-FHA), 69.0-74.3% (anti-PRN), and 97.1-97.2% (anti-FIM). For the booster response, seroprotection based on either the primary series or measles-containing vaccination regimen was 100.0% for anti-D and anti-T (≥0.01 IU/mL and ≥0.10 IU/mL), anti-HB (≥10 mIU/mL and ≥100 mIU/mL), anti-Hib (≥0.15 µg/mL and ≥1 µg/mL) and anti-polio 1, 2, and 3 (≥8 1/dil), and for the pertussis antigens booster response ranged from 88.6 to 91.8% (anti-PT), 91.1-95.9% (anti-FHA), 88.6-93.9% (anti-PRN), and 95.9-98.6% (anti-FIM). There were no safety concerns in any group. Conclusions: This study showed good antibody persistence of the DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine and good immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose given with MMR in the second year of life.Clinical Trials Registry India Number: CTRI/2018/04/013375.

Safety and immunogenicity of a hexavalent DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine versus separate DTwP-HB-PRP∼T and IPV vaccines in healthy infants in India.

Background: Multivalent vaccines containing whole-cell pertussis (wP) antigens combined with established diphtheria (D), tetanus (T), hepatitis B (HB), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), and inactivated poliomyelitis (IPV) antigens allow the provision of a high-quality, affordable DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine. Methods: Phase I/II, randomized, active-controlled, open-label study in healthy toddlers (Cohort I) and infants (Cohort II). Toddlers in Cohort I who had completed primary series D, T, P, HB, Hib, and polio vaccination received a booster dose of DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T (N = 30) or DTwP-HB-PRP∼T + IPV (N = 15) vaccines at 15-18 months of age. After satisfactory review of safety data in Cohort I, infants in Cohort II received DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T (N = 100) or DTwP-HB-PRP∼T + IPV (N = 50) at 6-8, 10-12, and 14-16 weeks of age. All infants in Cohort II had received previous oral polio and HB vaccines per country recommendations. Results: Booster and primary series vaccinations were well tolerated with no clinically significant differences between vaccine groups. Most adverse events were mild and resolved spontaneously; there were no vaccine-related serious adverse events and no deaths. In both vaccine groups, anti-D, anti-T, anti-HB, anti-Hib, and anti-polio 1, 2, and 3 seroprotection was 100% post-booster and post-primary series. For the pertussis antigens, booster response rate was > 86% in both groups. For the primary series, vaccine response rate was slightly higher for DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T than DTwP-HB-PRP∼T + IPV for anti-PT (80.2% and 70.8%) and anti-FHA (81.3% and 68.8%), slightly lower for anti-PRN (72.5% and 81.3%), and similar in each group for anti-FIM (95.6% and 97.9%). Conclusions: This study demonstrated a good safety and immunogenicity profile of the hexavalent DTwP-IPV-HB-PRP∼T vaccine for infant primary series vaccination at 6-8, 10-12, and 14-16 weeks of age and booster vaccination at 15-18 months of age and supported progression to the next development phase.